Skip to reference
ZLARAgent reference
v0.32026-11-06

ZLAR.io / State

Carry history. Re-establish the present.

An earlier account can remain accurate while the conditions for the next action have changed.

Four records, four meanings

RecordWhat it establishes
PermissionThe scope and conditions of a decision. Current validity must be established for the effect.
AttemptAn action was requested or initiated. This alone does not establish completion.
ObservationWhat a source actually observed, with its time and scope.
InterpretationA conclusion drawn from evidence. Preserve assumptions and remaining uncertainty.

A receipt is evidence within its format and scope. It is not a new permission, and an authentic record of a statement does not make every statement in it true.

A correct earlier analysis can be out of date

When inheriting a task, retain useful history and re-establish the facts that can change the next consequence: the object, recipient, amount, destination, policy, grant, expiry or execution status.

Example / The approved change and the present proposal diverge
OBSERVED STATE

Build A

Analysis describes this build and its expected effect.

DECISION

Build A approved

The decision identifies this build and this destination.

NEW PROPOSAL

Build B

The earlier approval does not establish permission for this different build.

Live observations and retained snapshots serve different purposes. Identify which you are using and when it was observed. Fast retrieval does not make old information current.

Unknown or partial outcomes

A response can be lost after an effect occurs. Separate completed work, the affected request, delayed effects and unknowns. Use the integration’s supported checking or recovery procedure within the access available.

Do not repeat a consequence merely to learn whether it happened. If the outcome cannot be established, state that clearly and identify the smallest information or decision needed. Continue independent permitted work.

Withdrawal has a timeline

  1. Request: the person takes back permission.
  2. Receipt of request: the relevant system or person receives it.
  3. Effective stopping: establish which work was actually stopped or safely concluded.
  4. Remaining effects: identify completed changes, effects still unfolding and uncertainty.

Stopping future work does not reverse an irreversible effect. A later objection remains a meaningful new statement even after completion; preserve its relationship to the original decision without rewriting the original.

Coordination and improvement

Carry the applicable scope and limits through delegation. More agents do not multiply an allowance or expand the permission. Coordinate the combined consequence, including work already completed or in flight.

Observe, investigate, propose, evaluate and check whether the change helped. Improvements already covered by valid permission can proceed. A repair with a new protected consequence needs the relevant decision.

Correct records explicitly. Attribute reports. Keep inferences distinguishable from observations. Share the minimum information necessary for the permitted purpose; public documentation is not a confidential case channel.